| Photo by Marek Studzinski on Unsplash
The Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) is a cornerstone of the country’s healthcare system, tasked with providing universal health coverage to Filipinos. Its mandate, rooted in the Universal Health Care Act, aims to ensure accessible and affordable healthcare for all. However, recent developments have spotlighted critical issues surrounding its funding, benefits, and operational scope.
PhilHealth offers a range of benefits, including coverage for inpatient care, outpatient services, and catastrophic illnesses. These benefits are structured under case rates, which set fixed amounts for specific medical conditions. While this system simplifies claims processing, discrepancies between PhilHealth’s case rates and actual hospital charges, especially in private facilities, have raised concerns about adequacy. For instance, studies have shown that PhilHealth’s rates often fall short of covering the full cost of procedures, leaving patients to shoulder significant out-of-pocket expenses.
Funding remains a perennial challenge. PhilHealth’s revenue streams include member contributions and government subsidies. However, the recent transfer of excess reserve funds to the national treasury has sparked controversy. Critics argue that these funds, intended for healthcare, should not be diverted, especially given the looming threat of another pandemic. On the other hand, proponents defend the move as a necessary step to address broader fiscal challenges.
The Philippines is undergoing a demographic transition characterized by an increasing working-age population, declining fertility rates, and improving life expectancy. While this shift presents opportunities for a larger pool of contributors to PhilHealth, it also poses challenges as the population ages and healthcare costs rise. Additionally, geographic disparities in PhilHealth coverage highlight the need for targeted interventions to ensure universal access.
Religion significantly influences healthcare decisions in the Philippines, with Catholicism playing a dominant role. Spirituality often shapes coping mechanisms during health crises; traditional healing practices coexist with modern medicine. These cultural factors can impact healthcare utilization and the effectiveness of PhilHealth’s programs.
PhilHealth’s benefits can be compared to other government programs like the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps), Assistance to Individuals in Crisis Situation (AICS), and Ayuda sa Kapos ang Kita Program (AKAP). While these programs provide direct cash transfers to alleviate poverty, PhilHealth focuses on reducing healthcare costs. Both approaches aim to improve financial stability but operate in different domains. If all these direct cash transfers were institutionalized into healthcare, education, and, most importantly, sustainable livelihood programs, outcomes may be surprisingly different.
The recent transfer of PhilHealth’s excess funds to the national treasury has raised legal and ethical questions. Proponents argue that the move aligns with fiscal policies and benefits broader social programs. Critics, however, emphasize constitutional provisions that prioritize healthcare funding. Legislative amendments may be necessary to clarify the use of government subsidies and ensure that healthcare remains a priority.
“By consolidating funds under one agency, implementing standardized policies, monitoring expenditures, and prioritizing universal health coverage would be easier. However, this would require significant legislative reforms to redefine the roles of local governments and other agencies in healthcare delivery.”
Lawmakers could consider reforms prioritizing benefit expansion over premium collection to address these challenges. Revisiting the case rate system to align it more closely with actual medical costs could alleviate financial burdens on patients. Strengthening oversight mechanisms to ensure transparency and accountability in fund management is equally vital.
Fragmented healthcare funding in the Philippines has long been challenging. Local governments, congressional initiatives, and national agencies manage various programs. This decentralization often leads to inefficiencies and opens the door to patronage politics, where political affiliations rather than healthcare needs may influence funding decisions.
Centralizing healthcare funding into PhilHealth could streamline operations, reduce redundancies, and ensure a more equitable distribution of resources. By consolidating funds under one agency, implementing standardized policies, monitoring expenditures, and prioritizing universal health coverage would be easier. However, this would require significant legislative reforms to redefine the roles of local governments and other agencies in healthcare delivery.
A typical route for indigent Filipinos seeking financial assistance for healthcare would course through the local government executive, the Mayor, then the district Congressman, onto the Provincial executive, the Governor, PCSO, PAGCOR, and the DSWD. The lucky may have access to a Malasakit Center that may reduce the number of stops to obtain all available funding – this all after PhilHealth benefits are exhausted. Zero balance billing may exist in certain jurisdictions, but not before patronage politics rears its ugly head. In the Philippine milieu, even healthcare is wielded as a weapon for winning elections.
The move could also face resistance from stakeholders who benefit from the current system and logistical challenges in integrating diverse funding streams. Transparency, accountability, and robust oversight mechanisms would be essential to making this transition successful. What do you think—would centralization be worth the effort?
PhilHealth’s role in the Philippine healthcare system is indispensable, but its challenges are multifaceted. Balancing financial sustainability with the need to provide comprehensive coverage requires a concerted effort from policymakers, healthcare providers, and the agency itself. As the country navigates post-pandemic recovery, ensuring that PhilHealth remains a reliable partner in healthcare will be key to achieving universal health coverage.
–——————————————————-
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Dr. Crispin Fernandez advocates for overseas Filipinos, public health, transformative political change, and patriotic economics. He is also a community organizer, leader, and freelance writer.
